The Art Institute of Pittsburgh Online Division is part of the Art Institutes system of schools, which has more than 40 locations in North America. The college is fully accredited by Middle States Association of Colleges and Schools, Commission on Higher Education. All of the 15 degree programs offered are available 100% online. Graduates are invited to attend the graduation ceremony in Pittsburgh. The diploma does not specify that the recipient’s degree is an online degree. Online students build a portfolio and are invited to join in the "portfolio show" along with on-campus students. Before a student begins the first class through this institution, an online student orientation must be completed. The Art Institute of Pittsburgh: Online Division offers three different career diplomas, three associate degree programs and 10 bachelor degrees. Students can choose a degree program from four different divisions of study. These are culinary arts, design, fashion, and media arts. Admissions requirements for the Art Institute of Pittsburgh: Online Division vary according to degree program. The average requirements are a high school grade point average of at least 2.0 or GED score of 225 or higher. Many programs wave this requirement if the applicant currently holds an associate degree or higher in another field of study. The Art Institute of Pittsburgh: Online Division participates in all types of federal financial aid programs and scholarship programs, just as any on-campus institution of higher learning. The college offers financial aid counselors to assist prospective students in this area.
Here are 5 ways to help combat social anxiety and regain your life. 1.Change your self-perception - You must first realize and accept that you are a worthwhile person. What you do in life is valuable in some way. Evaluate your worth by creating a list of things you have done that affected your life or the lives of others in a positive way. No matter what your station in life, you are valuable. Learn it and believe it. 2.Realize that perfection is not a goal - No one is perfect. Don't place unrealistic expectations on yourself. You are human and humans are fallible. Perfection is a very unrealistic goal that will only serve to defeat your purpose of discovering your own self-worth. 3.Engage in conversation - What you have to say is important. Start with one person at a gathering and strike up a conversation about something that interests you.
This will also help you realize how unfounded your fears are and allow you to feel more comfortable in large groups. 4.Educate yourself on current events - Pick up a newspaper and familiarize yourself on current events in the news. You can find a lot about world news, local news, and national news and even celebrity gossip to help you find engaging conversation. 5.Allow others to approach you - Don't worry about what anyone thinks of you. You should know your own worth and what others think is not your concern. Allow others at social gatherings to engage in conversation with you. You do not have to speak unless you want to speak. It is good to be a good listener as well. Remember to be positive and try implementing the above actions into your life. Your social anxiety should start to fade as you engage yourself with others. This means you have learned that you do not have to fear being judged or criticized now that you know your own self-worth.
The verdict was also an outlier: Guyger, a white police officer, was convicted of murder. That an officer faced charges to begin with in such a case is unusual, and a conviction is even rarer. But the jury that decided Guyger’s fate was perhaps most notable because it was diverse. The 12 jury members, plus four alternates, included seven black members, five nonblack people of color and four white members; 12 members of the entire pool were women, and the other four were men. A 2015 report published by the American Bar Association titled "Lack of Jury Diversity: A National Problem with Individual Consequences," demonstrated that across the country, nonwhites are consistently underrepresented on juries. The diversity of the Guyger jury has renewed discussion about the intersection of race, representation, bias and fairness in the criminal justice system. Laurin pushes back on the conclusion that jury diversity was the defining factor in Guyger’s case — and discourages people from assuming that in future cases, the prosecution’s odds of victory will be higher with a more diverse jury.